Your argument hinges on the idea that men discussing gender dynamics is inherently “mansplaining,” as if the act of questioning narratives or analyzing behaviors is a crime. You can't just type "mansplaining" cause you disagree. A little reductive, IMO.

If women talk and write about men and make mass monolithic statements based on hyperbole. We have the right to respond.

That’s the problem—shutting down discussion instead of debating it. You claim men are reducing women’s worth to stereotypes, yet your entire premise reduces men to cartoonish villains with sinister intent.